Draft LNRS for Hampshire
Summary
Document Viewer
Draft Local Nature Recovery Strategy for Hampshire
New Forest Consultative Panel
5 June 2025
Introduction
- Who we are
- Background to the Local Nature Recovery Strategy for Hampshire
- Engagement work to get us to this point
Areas of Particular Importance for Biodiversity (APIB):
Includes:
- National conservation sites
- Local Nature Reserves
- Local Wildlife Sites (SINCs)
- Irreplaceable habitat
(23.3% of Hampshire’s land area)
Priority Outcomes
A long-list of priorities was created from:
- A series of stakeholder workshops held between January and March 2024.
- An online public survey on priorities for nature recovery.
- A review of local plans and strategies, including local biodiversity action plans and catchment management plans.
These were shortlisted in priorities for recovering or enhancing that were critical to address in the Strategy, taking into consideration the contribution to other environmental benefits.
The aim of the shortlist is to have a set of priorities that:
- Contribute to the National Environmental Objectives.
- Address the opportunities and pressures identified in the description of the Strategy area.
- Sufficiently cover the variation of landscapes and ecosystems in the Strategy area.
- Balance the contributions from a range of stakeholders, from local experts through to local residents.
- Is a manageable number where delivery is possible over a reasonable number of years (LNRS timeframe is 3-10 yrs)
Examples of Priority Outcomes & Potential Measures
Chalk Streams, rivers, other watercourses, headwaters and groundwater protection zones
| Priority Outcome | Potential Measures |
|---|---|
| Riparian buffer strips created and managed to protect the area’s watercourses and headwaters, along with other potential measures aimed at reducing the amount of nutrients and pollutants entering the water courses and groundwaters. |
|
| Road surface water runoff is intercepted by natural flood management structures, with no direct pathways to watercourses. | R7 - Reduce the impact of road and urban runoff. |
| Barriers to fish movement along rivers and streams are removed or circumvented. | R8 – Removal of fish barriers. |
| Priority Species that will benefit | White-clawed crayfish, southern damselfly, two-tone reed beetle, fine-lined pea mussel, Desmoulin’s whorl snail, grey long-eared bat, and species listed in the following priority species assemblages for: chalk streams and other rivers and birds - reedbed and river birds. |
Examples of Priority Outcomes & Potential Measures
Species-rich grasslands – further subdivided into Priority grassland types
| Priority Outcome | Potential Measures |
|---|---|
| All existing species-rich grassland in positive management. |
|
| Degraded species-rich grassland restored back to species-rich grassland. |
|
| New areas of species-rich grassland created (including habitat expansion), linking existing areas of grasslands. |
|
| Priority Species that will benefit | Green-winged orchid, juniper, moonwort, field cow-wheat, marsh fritillary, Duke of Burgundy, striped lychnis, forester, smart-banded hunchback and hornet robberfly, and species listed in the following priority species assemblages: grazed chalk grassland with structural diversity and bare ground, grazed or mown trefoil/clover communities, and waxcaps and other grassland fungi. |
Examples of Priority Outcomes & Potential Measures
Heathland and acid grassland mosaics
| Priority Outcome | Potential Measures |
|---|---|
| All existing heathland and acid grassland mosaic in positive management. |
|
| Restoration of degraded heathland and acid grassland mosaic. |
|
| New areas of heathland and acid grassland mosaic created, and existing areas expanded, improving connectivity with existing areas of habitat. Includes agricultural land and restoration of mineral workings. | H3 - Creation of heathland from arable or improved grassland and mineral workings. |
| Priority Species that will benefit | Hornet robberfly, smart-banded hunchback, heath cudweed, heath lobelia, grass-poly, common butterwort, wood bolete, nail fungus, field cricket and other species listed in the following priority species assemblages: birds - breeding waders – wet grassland and heathland, birds - heathland birds, dry heaths with sand and gravel exposures, and heathlands occurring outside the New Forest. |
Examples of Priority Outcomes & Potential Measures
Wood pasture and parkland
| Priority Outcome | Potential Measures |
|---|---|
|
Existing lowland wood pasture, and historic parkland is restored and managed. Veteran trees are safeguarded and managed. New standard parkland trees are planted in appropriate locations New wood pasture created. |
|
| Priority Species that will benefit | Red-horned cardinal click beetle, zoned rosette, and species listed in the following priority species assemblages: lichens associated with mature and veteran trees in open parkland, and fungi associated with deciduous woodland and wood pasture in and outside the New Forest. |
Examples of Priority Outcomes & Potential Measures
Coastal
| Priority Outcome | Potential Measures |
|---|---|
| Coastal sand dunes and vegetated shingle protected and managed. | C1 - Creation and management of coastal sand dunes and vegetated shingle. |
| Coastal saltmarsh restored and managed. | C2 - Management and restoration of coastal saltmarsh. |
| Inter-tidal and saline habitat, including saltmarsh, created on coastal flood plain, intensive grassland, and arable land (subject to managed retreat/realignment) |
|
| Priority Species that will benefit | Gilkicker weevil, sea heath, Rinodina aspersa, Wilson’s pottia, and species listed in the following priority species assemblages: birds - shore birds – breeding, migrating and wintering, coastal grazing marsh and upper saltmarsh, saline lagoons, shingle and coastal grassland communities, and soft cliffs. |
Areas that Could Become of Importance for Biodiversity (ACB)
(12.6% of Hampshire’s land area)
APIB and ACB maps combined for the New Forest
Measures
(21.6% of Hampshire’s land area)
All measures for the New Forest
Selected Measures for the New Forest
Includes designated sites and other areas that connect to designated sites and priority habitats, following the Lawton principles of:
- Bigger
- Better
- More joined up
Selected Measures for Rivers and Riparian Buffers and Solent Wader & Brent Geese sites
Selected Measures: SINCs and RVEIs
Hectarage of habitat actively managed, restored or created
(includes SINCs for some measures)
| Habitat | Measure | Hectarage |
|---|---|---|
| Woodland creation | W1 | 3,700 ha |
| PAWs restoration | W7 | 7,340 ha |
| Woodland actively managed for priority species | W3 | 10,850 ha |
| Lowland calcareous grassland restored/created | LCG/LMW and G2/G3 | 7,326 ha |
| Other grasslands restored/created includes floodplain grazing marsh | LMW/PMP/CFGM and G2/G3 | 21,184 ha |
| Lowland heath with lowland acid grassland restored/created | LHL/LAG/PMP and H2/H3 | 9,413 ha |
| Restoring historic parkland and wood pasture | PP1 | 16,181 ha |
| Saltmarsh restored/created | C2/C3 | 1,304 ha |
| Riparian buffers | R1 | 1,638 ha |
| Total (includes some overlap) | c75,000 ha |
- G2:
- Restoration of species-rich grassland
- G3:
- Creation of species-rich grassland
- H2:
- Restore lowland heathland from forestry and secondary woodland
- H3:
- Create lowland heathland from arable land, improved grassland, and following mineral extraction
- PP1:
- Restore and manage lowland wood pasture and parkland and the planting of new trees to ensure succession
- C2 -
- Management and restoration of coastal saltmarsh
- C3 -
- Creation of inter-tidal and saline habitat on arable land, or on intensive grassland or by non-intervention
- R1 -
- Creation and management of buffer strips on land next to watercourses
Priority Species
- Long list of 1,618 species generated by HBIC using the Defra criteria
- Species Recovery workshop attended by 75 species experts covering many of the taxon groups
-
414 Priority Species were selected for the shortlist (with full audit trail), of which:
-
68 are Priority Species (not included in assemblages) including:
- 2 species are recovery class A – expansion/connectivity, that do not, therefore, require specific management measures.
- 21 species are class B, where targeted management measures are required.
- 2 species are class C, where only other environment improvements are required (water quality and air quality improvements).
- 26 species are class D, where bespoke management measures are required.
- The remaining 16 species are in a mix of recovery classes where measures are assumed but more evidence would be useful. This should not preclude action to restore populations based on current thinking. would be useful.
- 346 species are in 37 assemblages, of which 5 assemblages (covering 119 species) are confined wholly to the New Forest SSSI. These do not, therefore, require management measures in addition to those already covered in the SSSI/SAC management plans. They are present in the priority assemblage list for the purposes of awareness raising.
- The remaining species occur within assemblages where more generic but targeted measures can be applied to their habitat. Those that need more bespoke measures within an assemblage usually applies to one aspect of their life cycle e.g. for breeding or feeding and this is covered in the table as far as possible. A few species occur across several recovery classes.
-
68 are Priority Species (not included in assemblages) including:
Priority Species – example of an assemblage
Priority species assemblages for birds - farmland birds
Measures
Aim for a range of different crops and habitats, including fallow areas throughout the year, and retain areas of stubble. Create and manage set aside areas that could support a mosaic of scrub, species-rich grassland, rough grassland, beetle banks, some bare ground, and ponds or small wader scrapes to provide water and muddy edges. Reduce pesticide use to increase insect and small mammal numbers, and to reduce secondary poisoning of barn owls. Manage hay meadows to produce a range of seeds for seed eating species. Create areas of scrub and avoid cutting all hedgerows annually to allow them to develop.
| Taxon name | Common name | Habitat recovery class | Additional comments, measures, and links to fact sheets and web resources |
|---|---|---|---|
| Burhinus oedicnemus | Stone-curlew | B/D | Specific measures for stone curlew and lapwing - create 1-5ha uncropped fallow plots with 30% bare ground. Retain the plot until the crop is harvested from late July. Monitor breeding while protecting nests and chicks. Saving the stone-curlew - BirdGuides |
| Cuculus canorus | Cuckoo | A/B/F | Declining. Significant cuckoo decline in the New Forest. The principal host is dunnock, so to improve nesting opportunities, opening up the canopy in woodland to allow the shrub layer to develop may increase nesting opportunities for dunnocks and, therefore, cuckoos. Cuckoo decline | BTO - British Trust for Ornithology |
| Emberiza calandra | Corn bunting | B/D | Red listed, some recovery. Corn bunting conservation - Advice for Farmers (rspb.org.uk) |
| Emberiza citrinella | Yellowhammer | B | Red listed, limited numbers on heaths. Yellowhammer - Conservation advice for farmers (rspb.org.uk) |
| Falco tinnunculus | Kestrel | B | Wider farmland, declining. Kestrel | BTO - British Trust for Ornithology |
| Linaria cannabina | Linnet | B | Linnet - advice for Farmers (rspb.org.uk) |
| Vanellus vanellus | Lapwing | B/D | Lapwing - advice for Farmers (rspb.org.uk) |
| Perdix perdix | Grey partridge | B | Grey partridge - advice for Farmers (rspb.org.uk) |
| Streptopelia turtur | Turtle dove | A/B/F | Also a heathland bird. Has declined rapidly, and now only found at 2-3 sites in Hampshire. Provide feeding resources for turtle doves (operationturtledove.org) |
| Tyto alba | Barn owl | B/D/E | Include erection of nest boxes in pairs (within 500m of each other) at a density of about one pair per 500m square in barns or trees. Barn owl - Advice for Farmers (rspb.org.uk) |
| Alauda arvensis | Skylark | B | Declining nationally. Skylark conservation - advice for farmers (rspb.org.uk) |
Local Nature Recovery Strategies and landowners - farming
LNRS for Hampshire suggests the best actions in the best locations, from small nature-friendly schemes to large-scale habitat restoration
Sets out local priorities and the measures needed to achieve those priorities, and the wider environmental benefits that would flow from them – such as improved water quality, soil health, carbon capture and flood protection
It won’t require you to change how you use your land. It will help you make informed choices and see where there are opportunities for working with adjacent land managers on landscape-scale nature recovery. If you want to do nature recovery work in an area that isn’t prioritised in the LNRS, you still can.
All sites and areas identified in the Strategy are subject to existing land use and ownership constraints, and any prevailing constraints or conditions on site. Inclusion on the map does not automatically guarantee that it is possible to create that habitat in these areas. Maps are based on best available evidence. Any habitat creation schemes will need thorough investigation and appropriate consent.
Local Nature Recovery Strategies and landowners - development
The mapped areas do not prevent development from taking place. However, it is advised that developers and planners consider how developments can make a positive contribution towards the recommended measures in that area. The maps will also guide and incentivise landowners to create or enhance habitats for biodiversity net gain (BNG) by providing an increase in uplift through the Strategic Significance Multiplier
NPPF Para 192. To protect and enhance biodiversity and geodiversity, (local) plans should: (a) Identify, map and safeguard components of local wildlife-rich habitats and wider ecological networks, including the hierarchy of international, national and locally designated sites of importance for biodiversity; wildlife corridors and stepping stones that connect them; and areas identified by national and local partnerships for habitat management, enhancement, restoration or creation.
Timeline
| Date | Milestone |
|---|---|
| Spring 2025 | First draft of LNRS prepared |
| May-June 2025 | Consultation on draft LNRS |
| June 2025 | H2050 Select Committee to consider draft LNRS |
| Summer 2025 | Final Draft of LNRS prepared |
| Autumn 2025 | Consultation with supporting authorities on Final Draft |
| November 2025 | Cabinet approval of final LNRS |
| December 2025 | Submit LNRS to Defra |