11. ASSESSMENT
11.1 Ivy Cottage is a two storey brick dwelling of modest proportions lying within the defined village and also within The Weirs (Brockenhurst) Conservation Area. Constructed in 1895 this dwelling is a locally listed building, referenced in the Brockenhurst Conservation Area Character Appraisal. The cottage forms an important group of buildings with Hawthorn Cottage and Coronation Cottage. Hawthorn Cottage next door has previously been extended rearwards, but both currently retain their modest cottage frontages, facing the open forest. In the character appraisal it is noted that although the unpainted brickwork is likely to be original, the uPVC windows are not (currently now aluminium).
11.2 The applicant seeks permission to extend Ivy Cottage to the rear at two storey and single storey height (a side extension originally proposed has been omitted following concerns raised by the Parish Council and the NPA). The two storey rear extension would extend the existing ridge line by 2.3m, in combination with a rise in height to match the principle ridge. The form then steps down to a single storey. The rear single storey section would be stepped in by half a metre. On the SE elevation there would be a matching projecting gable end behind the existing. The utility room and rear extension at single storey are to have modestly pitched roofs that reflect the existing roof lines.
11.3 Ivy Cottage is an important example of a traditional New Forest cottage, in particular the appearance of the modestly proportioned principal elevation. It is therefore important that the proposed extensions are to respect this modest frontage and retain the 'Cottage Character' of the building.
11.4 The site lies within the defined village boundary and the property is not a small dwelling, and it is therefore considered that the form, size and scale of the proposed extensions, with regard to DP11, would be appropriate to the existing dwelling and curtilage. The ridge line along the front elevation would remain the greatest in length and thus it would be deemed that the cottage would not be over extended to the rear, remaining in proportion. The extension of the rear ridge is deemed acceptable. The breaking up of the longer rear form, through the stepping down to single storey, in combination with the inset, is considered to minimise the impact of the rear extensions. The omission of the side extension would respect the principal elevation, preserving the overall symmetry when viewed from the open forest.
11.5 The materials to be used would be appropriate to the existing dwelling and the area. The applicant proposes the use of brick and slate to match the existing. The windows would be altered from aluminium to timber frame, a positive step towards the traditional cottage style. However, to ensure that the fenestration would be appropriate, the submission of joinery details would be requested through condition. It is to be noted that the applicant does not wish to install any roof lights, aiding the retention of the traditional cottage appearance. The application would be in accordance with Policy DP6.
11.6 A neighbour has raised concerns regarding the loss of light and the amount of fenestration on the NW elevation. It is clear from the applicant’s plans, and when viewed on site, that the insertion of four windows would be modest, and would not have an adverse impact with regards to overlooking. Although the majority of the development is towards the neighbour’s property, the layout of the site is such that extension here reads best with the cottage. It is to be noted that the applicant has inset the rear most extension to break up the length of the NW elevations. Although the neighbour may see a reduction in light, they have also extended close to their own boundary line and have adequate fenestration/roof lights to allow natural light. The application is DP1 compliant.
11.7 The Tree Officer has raised no objection, but noted that as three Cypress trees are in close proximity, details would be required to ensure their retention; these would be sought by condition.
11.8 The applicant has stated that the size of the proposal would be similar to the works carried out on the neighbouring 'Hawthorn Cottage'. It is deemed that this is reasonably correct and as mentioned above the works would not overly impact upon the Conservation Area or neighbours' amenities.
11.9 Whilst the Parish Council recommended refusal, they were generally supportive of the design. The applicant has addressed the issues regarding loss of light to neighbouring property and 'tunnelling' effect along the boundary with the submission of amended plans.
11.10 It is deemed that the application would respect the proportions of the cottage and would make use of appropriate materials. It is therefore recommended that permission is granted subject to condition.